Aussie men, thick skin can still get skin cancer
There's no denying the fact that skin cancer is our national cancer; two in three people who grow up in Australia will be diagnosed with skin cancer at some point in their life. But not many people know that men are more likely to be diagnosed than women.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
In NSW, men over the age of 40 are 1.5 times more likely to be diagnosed and 2.5 times more likely to die of melanoma than women of a similar age, so this Men's Health Week, we're urging men across the state to pledge to do better when it comes to sun protection.
Evidence has shown men generally have poorer sun protection behaviours, and with UV as the source of nearly all skin cancers in Australia, when you protect your skin you reduce your risk.
Men are also more likely to work outdoors compared to women, which increases exposure to UV radiation by five to 10 times the amount of UV radiation than working indoors.
Our recent survey also showed that a significantly lower proportion of than men than women said they use sun protection year-round.
In NSW, we experience UV levels high enough to do damage at least 10 months of the year across our state, so it is crucial that men consider sun protection as an everyday habit. We have higher rates of melanoma along the coast and find increased risk for those living in the north of the state, due to higher UV levels being closer to the equator.
It's never too late to reduce your risk of skin cancer, so don't wait for summer to start taking sun protection seriously. Remember that the easiest way to be sun safe is to have some form of protection between your skin and the sun - a shirt, sunscreen, a hat, shade and sunglasses.
Get to know your own skin, including skin not normally exposed to the sun, and speak to a doctor if you notice any change in shape, colour or size of a spot, or the development of a new spot.
Liz King, Skin Cancer Prevention Manager, Cancer Council NSW
Interpreting history
History is no longer just a collection of dates, locations and events, it is a provocation, a reality, and a justification. History becomes a raying call if not a war cry, but what is the history of any event?
An initial problem with interpreting history is that it is fluid based on who is telling the story and even how much of the story is known.
Rodney King's story became a turning point in history, not just because he was telling the truth but when it was supported by video evidence.
Australia is a country with a positive reputation and is seen to be a friendly and open society. One example of the problem with viewing history was when the Prime Minister Scott Morrison proudly said '... There was no slavery in Australia' (June 11) but he was quickly corrected.
Slavery is illegal in Australia as it is in most countries but the semantics that slavery didn't exist because the Indigenous people who were placed on farms as 'workers' and 'domestics' and didn't get any pay apart from a roof and food weren't slaves is surely flawed as this is just legalized slavery. Semantics do not change the truth and nor should they be used to attempt to change history.
Another sad story of the mistreatment of history also comes from Australia where a mining company Rio Tinto blew up, legally, an indigenous site with rock paintings approximately 46,000 years old. When History can be destroyed so easily so can the lessons from history. We must learn from history and be honest about what has happened.
As a white, middle class person, I have no real knowledge or understanding of the issues involved on the 'Black Lives Matter' beyond the obvious, Black Lives do Matter, the treatment of people of different colors is different, the police are meant to protect is from danger but sometimes, and more frequently in the USA, they are the danger.
My only experience of prejudice and a trivial one is the differences between Catholic and Presbyterian communities in a small country town, probably based on the stories from when the families lived in Ireland in the 1850s. Social groupings were still fairly separate even in the 1960s and it influenced employment opportunities and who were meant to be your friends.
One of the rallying posters from World War One asked 'Daddy, what did you do in the great war?' and the basis of the question applies just as much now in the war against racism and violence.
Most people support equality but won't take up the opportunity to walk although they should make a statement in some way, kneeling, wearing a badge, donating to charities and writing to their elected representatives. In the end it will be the words spoken or written into laws that will make the changes although actions will prompt this change.
History will record this year as dangerous because of the COVID-19 virus, disgraceful because of the death of one man, embarrassing because of President Trump but what I want it to record is that finally change occurred to stop racism and violence. I will wait, I will stand and kneel, I will hope.
Dennis Fitzgerald, Melbourne