If you're an Australian cricket fan struggling to recognise some of the names and faces in the national team, this might explain why.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
More players have represented Australia in the past three years than in all of the 1990s combined, Fairfax Media analysis shows.
The introduction of Twenty20 cricket and a relatively unsettled period in the national Test team have contributed to 67 players being used since November 2014. (How many can you name?)
By contrast, only 65 players represented Australia in the 1990s.
The frequency of Test and one-day matches has not actually increased much in that time, although the introduction of the T20 format has lifted the number of matches played each year.
It might be tempting to blame the revolving door selections on poor form by the team. But a comparison of the winning percentages shows they are remarkably equal.
Australia actually have a higher winning percentage in Tests in recent years, although contributing to that is the fact draws are becoming increasingly rare in the five-day game. It's Australia's poor performance in the shortest form of the game that drags down the overall win percentage.
Certainly loyalty is at a premium, however. More than half of the 67 players used in the past three years (36) have played fewer than 10 of Australia's 123 matches. Twenty-six players have played fewer than five matches.
Only 19 players played less than five matches for Australia in the 1990s.
Two things seem to be driving the change. One, the belief in picking specialists for each format of the game. And two, the seemingly relentless pace of change in the T20 team, as selectors use it to blood players.
Indeed, of the 67 players picked in the past three years, only 33 have played Test cricket, 41 ODIs, while 44 players have been used in just 21 T20s.