News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Gunnedah properties in limbo:fears devalue land 

Gunnedah properties in limbo:fears devalue land

01 Sep, 2011 08:53 AM
GUNNEDAH Shire Council will ask the NSW government to remove the uncertainty and address diminishing property values for landholders who find themselves within mineral and petroleum exploration licences (ELs).

Mayor Adam Marshall said the council had endorsed a notice of motion from councillor Stephen Benham at its last meeting to write to member for Tamworth Kevin Anderson about its concerns about the effect ELs are having on the asset value of properties in and adjoining EL areas.

He said with about 50 per cent of Gunnedah shire currently under exploration, there was a great deal of uncertainty there.

“Council will also be requesting the NSW government to explain what action it is taking to protect property equity for affected landholders,” Cr Marshall said.

“Council has raised this issue previously with the former NSW government with no success, so we’re trying again with the new government and hoping to receive a better response.”

Cr Marshall said the council had received numerous representations from local property owners and real estate agents, who reported extreme difficulty marketing properties within active ELs and achieving sale prices anywhere near market value.

“Essentially, what we’re often seeing is the devaluation of property assets within active ELs, largely due to the uncertainty that is created,” he said.

“There have been numerous examples locally of potential buyers of properties within ELs simply walking away or only being prepared to purchase at a discounted rate.

“Not only does this create great difficulty in marketing an affected property, but landholders are often reluctant to invest in any capital improvements on their properties when there’s a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the future land use around them.”

Cr Marshall said ultimately landholders were left stuck in no-man’s-land.

“If they’re to sell and get out, they must accept a price below the market value, or stay and with no certainty about the future and what development may occur,” he said.

Cr Marshall said the council would be telling the government that for many rural landholders, their property was their superannuation fund and that people affected were rightfully concerned that ELs were depreciating their prime asset, yet they were powerless to do anything about it.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is time to control CSG industry & other miners y reviewing & updating the Mining Act
Posted by Machiavelli, 2/09/2011 6:03:39 AM, on Northern Daily Leader
The same problems are happening in Gloucester. It is understood that in the Gloucester Region, 90% of the land is owned by mining companies along the Vale of Gloucster. Property values have dropped and mining companies are renting out the farm houses on their acquired properties. Houses are not selling south of Gloucester to people who wish to enjoy the rural lifestyle. One, there isn't much available and two, whose which are, will have a view of another coal mine and 110 coal seam gas wells along the Valley. This madness has to stop.
Posted by aussie, 2/09/2011 10:35:30 AM, on Northern Daily Leader
wouldn't it be better to ask the former state government and the deptment of planning why they were handing them out like lollies at a kids picnic
Posted by spike, 2/09/2011 6:58:53 PM, on Northern Daily Leader

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Tamworth Srevices Club 080512



Northern Daily Leader







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...